Britain and Rwanda have clashed at an international court over more than £100 million Kigali says London still owes from a scrapped migrant deportation deal.
The dispute is being heard at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, where the case is focused on contractual disagreements between the two nations.
Representing Rwanda, Justice Minister Emmanuel Ugirashebuja said the country regretted taking the matter to court but had no other option after what he described as the United Kingdom’s refusal to honour its financial obligations.
He stated that Rwanda had been deprived of substantial funds under the agreement and accused Britain of failing to comply with the terms of the deal.
According to Britain’s submission, Rwanda had initially agreed to waive future payments tied to the migrant deal but later reversed that position.
The legal proceedings began with Rwanda presenting its arguments, while British representatives are expected to respond subsequently before final submissions from both sides.
The arbitration panel is expected to take several months before delivering a final ruling on the matter.
The dispute stems from a controversial migration agreement under which Britain planned to deport certain asylum seekers to Rwanda for processing.
The policy was later scrapped by the British government, leading to disagreements over outstanding financial commitments under the original arrangement.
The case highlights growing diplomatic and legal tensions between both countries following the collapse of the migrant relocation plan.
The dispute is being heard at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, where the case is focused on contractual disagreements between the two nations.
Representing Rwanda, Justice Minister Emmanuel Ugirashebuja said the country regretted taking the matter to court but had no other option after what he described as the United Kingdom’s refusal to honour its financial obligations.
He stated that Rwanda had been deprived of substantial funds under the agreement and accused Britain of failing to comply with the terms of the deal.
According to Britain’s submission, Rwanda had initially agreed to waive future payments tied to the migrant deal but later reversed that position.
The legal proceedings began with Rwanda presenting its arguments, while British representatives are expected to respond subsequently before final submissions from both sides.
The arbitration panel is expected to take several months before delivering a final ruling on the matter.
The dispute stems from a controversial migration agreement under which Britain planned to deport certain asylum seekers to Rwanda for processing.
The policy was later scrapped by the British government, leading to disagreements over outstanding financial commitments under the original arrangement.
The case highlights growing diplomatic and legal tensions between both countries following the collapse of the migrant relocation plan.
Filed under
#UK
#Rwanda
#Migrant deal
#International court
#Global politics
#Immigration policy
#World news
#Legal dispute
Your reaction
Story guide
Understand this story
Summary
Britain and Rwanda face off in court over £100m linked to a scrapped migrant deal, with Kigali accusing London of failing to meet financial obligations. Britain and Rwanda have clashed at an international court over more than £100 million Kigali says London still owes from a scrapped migrant deportation deal.The dispute is being heard at the Permanent Court...
Key takeaways
- Britain and Rwanda face off in court over £100m linked to a scrapped migrant deal, with Kigali accusing London of failing to meet financial obligations.
- Britain and Rwanda have clashed at an international court over more than £100 million Kigali says London still owes from a scrapped migrant deportation deal.The dispute is being heard at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, where the case is focused on contractual disagreements between the two nations.Representing Rwanda, Justice Minister Emmanuel Ugirashebuja said the country regretted taking the matter to court but had no other option after what he described as the United Kingdom’s refusal to honour its financial obligations.He stated that Rwanda had been deprived of substantial funds under the agreement and accused Britain of failing to comply with the terms of the deal.According to Britain’s submission, Rwanda had initially agreed to waive future payments tied to the migrant deal but later reversed that position.The legal proceedings began with Rwanda presenting its arguments, while British representatives are expected to respond subsequently before final submissions from both sides.The arbitration panel is expected to take several months before delivering a final ruling on the matter.The dispute stems from a controversial migration agreement under which Britain planned to deport certain asylum seekers to Rwanda for processing.The policy was later scrapped by the British government, leading to disagreements over outstanding financial commitments under the original arrangement.The case highlights growing diplomatic and legal tensions between both countries following the collapse of the migrant relocation plan.
- This story is filed under Foreign on Glow 99.1 FM.
Article FAQ
What is this story about?
Britain and Rwanda face off in court over £100m linked to a scrapped migrant deal, with Kigali accusing London of failing to meet financial obligations. Britain and Rwanda have clashed at an international court over more than £100 million Kigali says London still owes from a scrapped migrant deportation deal.The dispute is being heard at the Permanent Court...
Who published this story?
Glow 99.1 FM published this story with Oyebade Oluwatobiloba listed as author.
When was it published?
March 18, 2026
